The Biophilia hypothesis / edited by Stephen R. Kellert and Edward O. Wilson.
Language: English Series: A Shearwater bookPublisher: Washington, D.C. Island Press, 1993Description: 484 s. diagr., tabISBN:- 1559631481
- 1559631473
- Miljöetik
- Djurrätt
- Naturfilosofi
- Djur och människor
- Philosophy of nature
- Human ecology -- Philosophy
- Nature conservation -- Philosophy
- Biological diversity conservation -- Philosophy
- human ecology
- nature conservation
- biodiversity
- ethics
- Human-animal relationships
- Animal rights
- Philosophy of nature
- Environmental ethics
- 179 .1 23
- Uhb
- Dguh
- Dgug
| Item type | Current library | Shelving location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book | Biblioteket HKR | Biblioteket | 170 Biophilia | Available | 11156000172911 |
Enhanced descriptions from Syndetics:
"Biophilia" is the term coined by Edward O. Wilson to describe what he believes is humanity's innate affinity for the natural world. In his landmark book Biophilia, he examined how our tendency to focus on life and lifelike processes might be a biologically based need, integral to our development as individuals and as a species. That idea has caught the imagination of diverse thinkers.The Biophilia Hypothesisbrings together the views of some of the most creative scientists of our time, each attempting to amplify and refine the concept of biophilia. The variety of perspectives -- psychological, biological, cultural, symbolic, and aesthetic -- frame the theoretical issues by presenting empirical evidence that supports or refutes the hypothesis. Numerous examples illustrate the idea that biophilia and its converse, biophobia, have a genetic component: fear, and even full-blown phobias of snakes and spiders are quick to develop with very little negative reinforcement, while more threatening modern artifacts -- knives, guns, automobiles -- rarely elicit such a response people find trees that are climbable and have a broad, umbrella-like canopy more attractive than trees without these characteristics people would rather look at water, green vegetation, or flowers than built structures of glass and concrete The biophilia hypothesis, if substantiated, provides a powerful argument for the conservation of biological diversity. More important, it implies serious consequences for our well-being as society becomes further estranged from the natural world. Relentless environmental destruction could have a significant impact on our quality of life, not just materially but psychologically and even spiritually.
Table of contents provided by Syndetics
- Prelude: "A Siamese Connexion with a Plurality of Other Mortals"
- Introduction
- Part I Clarifying the Concept
- Chapter 1 Biophilia and the Conservation Ethic
- Chapter 2 The Biological Basis for Human Values of Nature
- Part II Affect and Aesthetics
- Chapter 3 Biophilia, Biophobia, and Natural Landscapes
- Chapter 4 Humans, Habitats, and Aesthetics
- Chapter 5 Dialogue with Animals: Its Nature and Culture
- Part III Culture
- Chapter 6 Searching for the Lost Arrow: Physical and Spiritual Ecology in the Hunter's World
- Chapter 7 The Loss of Floral and Faunal Story: The Extinction of Experience
- Chapter 8 New Guineans and Their Natural World
- Part IV Symbolism
- Chapter 9 On Animal Friends
- Chapter 10 The Sacred Bee, the Filthy Pig, and the Bat Out of Hell: Animal Symbolism as Cognitive Biophilia
- Part V Evolution
- Chapter 11 God, Gaia, and Biophilia
- Chapter 12 Of Life and Artifacts
- Part VI Ethics and Political Action
- Chapter 13 Biophilia, Selfish Genes, Shared Values
- Chapter 14 Love It or Lose It: The Coming Biophilia Revolution
- Chapter 15 Biophilia: Unanswered Questions
- Coda
- Index